CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Research
Language learning is important for human’s social
development. As a language which is used by more than a half of population in the
world, English holds the key as international language. English is a tool of
communication among peoples of the world to get trade, social-cultural,
science, and technology goals. Moreover, English competence is important in
career development, therefore students need to understand and use English to
improve their confidence to face global competition.
English
as a formal subject is given to junior high school (SMP) level, which the goals
are translated as follows: “The goals of teaching and learning English for this
level are improving the four English skills. They are the mastery of the
receptive skills (reading and listening) and the mastery of the productive
skills (speaking and writing), within a specified word level and relevant
grammatical structures and notions, in the context of the specified themes
which are enclosed for junior high school (SMP) students” (Balitbang Depdiknas,
2002:42).
The
fact shows that the result of teaching learning English is still low. Somantri
said (2003) that there can be a wonder about the condition of the student’s
English ability. The students have learned English from the first-grade of
junior high school until senior high school, but most of them still cannot use
English as tool of communication. Zamroni in Somantri (2003) found that it not
only happened to the students who have score below five, but the students who
have score over eight in junior high school can not use English in real
communication in their level. Besides, their receptive skills are also below the
expectation. For example, the students who have graduated from senior high
school, they still find difficulty in reading English literatures (Balitbang
Depdiknas, 2002:1).
These failures are influenced by many factors. According to
Zamroni in Somantri (2003), it happens because of the education system at
school just transfer the dead knowledge where the knowledge is separated from
the application. Teachers teach materials that will be tested. The goal is that
the students get good score in the final test. While Ali in Ant-O2 (2005)
argues that the low of the students quality in teaching and learning English
happens because the students are used to memorizing and doing multiple choice
assignment. Both of arguments above show that the process of teaching and
learning English is not so support the improvement of life skills. Students can
get good score in the final test and they can memorize the theory well but they
cannot use English in real communication.
Assessment is one of important thing that has important role
in education. The importance of assessment in education is stated by Hughes
(1989) who says that the proper relationship between teaching and assessment is
partnership. By assessment process teacher can discover how far students have
achieved the objectives of a course of study. Teacher also can use the result
of assessment to analyze which material that should be explained again and
which instruments that should be repaired. Besides, assessment is useful for
the students to motivate in teaching learning process.
Based on the earlier observation, researcher finds that most
of teachers still use traditional assessment. The students are given some tasks
in the form of multiple choice, do the LKS, practice a dialog in textbook and
another task, which make the students as a passive subject. Traditional
assessment includes multiple-choice questions and asking students to respond
questions with short answers. Many kinds of task are given in order the
students can respond the questions with correct answers in the final test. The
product of learning is more emphasized then the process it self. Teacher gives
quizzes and tests to assess cognitive aspect only. This kind of assessment is
just recall student’s memorization.
In traditional assessment process, teachers give less
attention and rarely to assess the student’s work. It brings the students
become lack of attention toward their error in finishing their work. According
to Kasiram (1984:10), learning will be on the decline if the students do not
know the result of their work. The students want to know feedback of their
effort in doing the work as a motivation in learning process. Dimyati and
Mudjiono (2002:48) stated that students would be more motivated in learning if
the students know the result of their work as a feedback.
Under the government policy, the Ministry of National
Education develops new curriculum to improve the education quality that is
Competency Based Curriculum. The success of Competency Based Curriculum may be
consider successfully if followed by the change of teaching and learning
strategy at class, the choosing of media, and the choosing of assessment
process. (Balitbang Depdiknas, 2002:1). Assessment processes in Competency
Based Curriculum are
more
varies. One of them is Portfolio Assessment.
Arter & Spandel (in Luitel, 2002) state the notion of
portfolio. The literary meaning of the term ‘portfolio’ is a collection of the
past work. However, in the context of assessment, portfolio does not represent
only a mere collection of the past work. The Northwest Evaluation Association
urges that the portfolio is a purposeful collection of student work that tells
the story of the student’s effort, progress, or achievement in given areas.
Portfolio can be viewed as a systematic and organized collection of evidence
used by the teacher and student to monitor the growth of student’s knowledge,
skills, and attitudes in a specific content area.
The indicators of portfolio assessment are daily test
result, structured tasks, anecdotal record, and report of the student’s
activity out of school (Budimansyah, 2002: 108). These indicators are put on
the list and documented in a file. From
the collection, teacher assesses skill of the students. Teacher turns the students
to see their ability in learning by using portfolio and turns the students to
be careful in doing the work, pay attention to the error in their work and
correct the error.
Based on the background, researcher interested in studying
the student’s learning achievement in the classes which use traditional
assessment and portfolio assessment. Researcher was conducting this study on
the students of SMP 4 Jambi, with the title “Student’s Learning Achievement
with Traditional Assessment and Portfolio Assessment”.
1.2 Formulation
of the Problems
The problems of this research are:
(1)
How is the student’s learning
achievement with traditional assessment?
(2)
How is the student’s learning
achievement with portfolio assessment?
(3)
How is the difference between the
student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio
assessment?
1.3 Objectives
of the Research
Based on the research questions above, the main purposes of
this research are to find out the following:
(1)
To describe the student’s learning
achievement with traditional assessment.
(2)
To describe the student’s learning
achievement with portfolio assessment.
(3)
To find out the difference between
the student’s learning achievement with traditional assessment and portfolio
assessment.
.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar